No Picture
Health Department

Healthcare Challenges With Food Service Design

Food creates emotion. When we add the word healthcare into the conversation, well, one can guess what emotion will arise. Healthcare food services, whether in continuing care retirement communities (CCRC), assistant living, skilled care, hospitals, rehabilitation facilities, daycare or meals on wheels, have the opportunity to improve current outcomes.
As with any emotional challenge, focusing on the problem and drilling down to identify deficiencies will determine which next steps are needed to solve or limit the concern. The reason the word “limit” is used is that in many situations healthcare consumers may not have a choice in selecting their favorite foods based on medical-related restrictions. With this in mind, the challenge starts in developing and designing food service operations that meet the needs of our compromised food audiences.
Thinking about our targeted audiences, I like to start with our CCRC and assisted living operations. These programs require kitchen designs that resemble a traditional table-service restaurant offering a variety of food selections. However, these designs need to be flexible, to control nutritional requirements and overcome physical limitations.
Hospitals and rehabilitation facilities are much more complicated to design than traditional CCRC or assisted living from a food service equipment and layout perspective. The design and capability of the equipment must allow food service personnel to create the perception of food choices. food service staff must also meet the requirements of patients’ nutritional needs, not to mention the 12 or more menu spreads, coordinating med-pass, clinical procedures, meal delivery obstacles and related concerns.
Skilled nursing facilities have historically used hospital-feeding concepts but, over the past few years, have moved away from this approach in feeding residents by creating decentralized buffet-type service programs that help to create more of a perception of choice. Terminology used in the industry is country kitchen or point of service, just to name two. The challenges in trying to offer a buffet food concept include the fact that residents require feeding, frequently wish to eat in their rooms, and limited staffing. The financial abilities of skilled facilities to add staff for meal service is rare, which requires that a food service design maximize staff optimization.
Daycare and meals-on-wheels programs have still other conceptual requirements. Because the audience lives in the community, meal service needs to match the ethnic flavor expectations and social gathering environments of different neighborhoods, which are just two of the factors to which clients are accustomed. This does not take into account the specialty equipment necessary for cooking for table and delivery service, not to mention the skilled staff required to produce the meals.
In each of these examples, healthcare food service designs and concepts need to focus on delivery of service and meeting the expectations of the audience by placing customers at the center of the design and not as an off-shoot of it. Services are not peripheral activities, but are an integral part of society. Just because healthcare has been institutionalized, its food service operations should not lose sight of the service requirements of its varied audiences.…

No Picture
Healthy Nutrition

Mental Healthcare Reform – Present Successes and Future Challenges

As healthcare reform is becoming a reality, there is much to celebrate within the mental health community. This includes passage of a healthcare reform package that includes parity for mental health and addiction services, expansion of Medicaid to 133% of Federal Poverty Level, inclusion of behavioral health organizations and individuals with mental illnesses in the new Medicaid medical home state option, and authorization and increased funding for grants co-locating mental health treatment and primary care. These and a host of other provisions expand the opportunities for individuals with mental illnesses and addictions to obtain and maintain insurance coverage and access needed services.
But this is not the end of the mental healthcare battle. Simply put, mental health advocates must be ready to play in a new game, in a world where increasing numbers of individuals – by virtue of Medicaid expansion, the emerging Health Insurance Exchanges, and parity regulations – will have access to behavioral health services. We expect to see an additional 15 million individuals – an increase of 43% – eligible for Medicaid alone, with more than 30 million individuals overall who will, in the not too distant future, have insurance coverage.
But this is far more than a matter of numbers – it’s about working smarter. Advocates of mental healthcare anticipate that healthcare reform-driven service delivery redesign and payment reform will unfold at a rapid pace. In order to bend the cost curve, payment reform and service delivery redesign will change how health, mental health, and substance use services are integrated, funded, and managed. Providers must learn to practice healthcare the way healthcare will be done.
As mental healthcare providers and advocates, we must become savvy about positioning ourselves to take advantage of new markets and new opportunities to help control the design and delivery of healthcare services. We must begin to build relationships within and across the entire healthcare sector. As we revisit the concept of “managing care” for individuals and whole populations, we have to be certain that our focus on person-centered, recovery-focused treatment and services is not subsumed by the drive to “bend the curve” in healthcare costs. We must be able to demonstrate our value not only to our customers, but also as key players in these new healthcare consortia.
We must become accountable for efficient and effective services that show results across all health domains. We believe fee-for-service reimbursement will slowly become a thing of the past. So, too, will be the ability to claim that caseloads are full with no-show rates of 50% and more. We risk being left on the sidelines if we don’t move with deliberate speed to ensure continuity and timely access to care; comply with third-party payer requirements; coordinate care with a full range of health providers; and if necessary take on payers that refuse to honor the spirit and letter of the parity regulations.
We must become increasingly customer-focused, from the way we greet individuals who come through our door to the way we market our services. We should expect that with more money available in healthcare – particularly for mental health and addiction treatment – that new and well capitalized players will find behavioral health, traditionally a financially unattractive healthcare sector, far more appealing.
People will be insured and will have an increasing range of options available to them. What differentiates our mental healthcare services? Why should an individual choose to receive treatment and support from us? Are we offering services that will help them meet a full range of healthcare needs? Are our services culturally appropriate for the communities we serve? Can we help them understand and make appropriate use of their insurance coverage? We must retool our organizations with the knowledge that all individuals will now become true “consumers” of healthcare services.
At the same time, we must also be aware that our work is far from over at the state and federal level. Forty eight of 50 states are experiencing severe budget shortfalls. The threat is very real and the mental healthcare advocates are fighting hard to hold on to current funding as legislatures see an opportunity to continue to withdraw needed funds. This is surely a bad idea – even the most generous healthcare benefits will likely not cover the full range of wraparound supports that people with mental illnesses and addictions need to fully recover.
Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “It takes as much energy to wish as it does to plan.” All of our planning, advocacy, and leadership to date have borne fruit, but we must not be content to wish it all works out well. We must fight for our future – and the future of the individuals we are privileged to serve – by acting as key players in the brave new world of healthcare.…